Name of Country Name of Agency Assessment Criteria Methodology Outcome Validity Period
United States of America (USA) Carries out periodic review (“recognition”) of institutional and programmatic accrediting organizations. CHEA, which accredits the accreditation agencies, and the accreditation agencies which assess and accredit the HEIs
https://www.chea.org/
Based on the standards/criteria set by the accreditation agency, the Institution prepares a performance summary. A group of external Experts/Peers appointed by the accreditation agency reviews the report submitted by the institution and requests for further information wherever necessary. The Peer Team undertakes an ‘Onsite’ visit to the Institution for validating the claims made by the institution. Based on the report of the Peer Team, the accreditation agency either confers or denies accreditation to the Institution. There is an external review which takes place every   few years tooncein10 years
United Kingdom (UK) Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (UK): As the independent body entrusted with monitoring and advising on standards and quality in UK higher education, QAAHE is dedicated to checking that the three million students working towards a UK qualification get the higher education experiences they are entitled to expect. QAAHE ensure that students are involved in all aspects of our work.
https://www.qaa.ac.uk/
The QAAHE has set out guidelines on good practices and the principles that the institutions should satisfy. Based on these codes of practices the Institution prepares and submits the self- evaluation documents. A group of Peers appointed by the accreditation agency reviews the self- evaluation documents prepared by the institution and requests for further information wherever necessary. Institutional audit consists of a comprehensive scrutiny of the internal quality assurance mechanisms and validation of the claims made by the institution. The assessment process also involves interactions and involvement of all stakeholders. The audit team gives its judgment either as “broad confidence”, or “limited confidence” or “no confidence   Institutional review takes place in a six- year cycle. Based on the judgment, however there may be reviews at shorter intervals as well.  
Australia TEQSA: Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency,  Australia’s independent national quality assurance and regulatory agency for higher education.
AUQA was dissolved in 2011 and its functions were transferred to the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency. (TEQSA)
https://www.teqsa.gov.au/
TEQSA does not provide any specific criteria and as such every institution offering itself for accreditation has to evolve its own quality systems relevant to its specified objectives. The institution submits a portfolio, which is nothing but a documented self-review. TEQSA appointsaPeerTeamwhichreviewstheportfoliosubmittedbytheinstitution.Peer Team undertakes a site visit and performs the external review. During this visit, the Team is also expected to consider how the institution meets the National Protocols of Higher Education Approval Processes. The team reports on “Commendable practices” and “areas for improvement”   Based on the recommendations the institutions submit a progress report between 18-24monthsof publication of the audit report. AUQA monitors and provides help as and when required. The subsequent audit may be anytime within a five-year period from the initial audit.
India The NATIONAL ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION COUNCIL (NAAC) conducts assessment and accreditation of Higher Educational Institutions (HEI) such as colleges, universities or other recognised institutions to derive an understanding of the ‘Quality Status’ of the institution. NAAC evaluates the institutions for its conformance to the standards of quality in terms of its performance related to the educational processes and outcomes, curriculum coverage, teaching-learning processes, faculty, research, infrastructure, learning resources, organisation, governance, financial well being and student services.
http://www.naac.gov.in/
Based on the seven criteria frame work of NAAC, the institutions submit their self analysis in the format/ manual given by NAAC, term leads the Self-study Report (SSR). A group of external Experts/Peers appointed by the NAAC reviews the report submitted by the institution and requests for further information wherever necessary. The Peer Team undertakes the ‘Onsite’ visit to the Institution for validating the claims made by the institution. Based on the qualitative report of the Peer Team and the scores assigned to the individual criteria and the overall institutional score NAAC assigns a grade.   Institutional review takes place in a five- year cycle. The institutions are expected to submit annually a quality assurance report, through which NAAC monitors their performance.
India NIRF The National Institutional Ranking Framework is a methodology adopted by the Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India, to rank institutions of higher education in India.
https://www.nirfindia.org/Home
Based on the 5 criteria (Teaching Learning & Resources, Research and Professional Practice, Graduation Outcome, Outreach & Inclusivity, Perception) set by the agency, the Institution prepares a performance summary. A group of external Experts/Peers appointed by the NIRF reviews the report submitted by the institution and requests for further information wherever necessary. Third party agency may conduct the survey based on the points prepared by experts for the institution. Based on the report of the Online Application form, the accreditation agency either confers or denies annual ranking to the Institution. There is an external review which takes place every years
Asia and Africa Higher Education Council of ADCO (HECA) is a methodology adopted by the Asia Africa Development Council, for Accreditation and assessment and of higher education Institutions (Universities and Colleges) in Asia and Africa.
https://asiafricaonline.com/assessment-parameters-institution/
Based on the seven criteria frame work of HECA, the institutions submit their self analysis in the format/ manual given by HECA, term evaluates the Report of Self-Assessment (RSA). A group of external Experts/Peers appointed by the HECA reviews the RSA submitted by the institution and requests for further information wherever necessary. The Peer Team may undertakes the ‘Onsite’ visit to the Institution for validating the claims made by the institution. Based on the qualitative report of the Peer Team and the scores assigned to the individual criteria and the overall institutional score HECA assigns a grade.   Institutional review takes place in a four- year cycle. The institutions are expected to submit annually a quality assurance report, through which HECA monitors their performance.